Victorious Primary School in Mukono District has come under scrutiny following an incident in which a teacher allegedly entered a Primary Leaving Examination (PLE) room with unauthorised materials containing answers to the 2026 Mathematics examination paper.
The teacher, Juliet Mwesigwa, 49, a resident of Butabira Village in Buikwe District, allegedly committed the offence on November 3, 2026, at Victorious Primary School, Nakapinyi North, Nama Sub-county, Mukono District, where she had been assigned to serve as a transcriber for a candidate with special needs.
According to the available information, Mwesigwa was found in possession of papers bearing answers to the Mathematics examination, which she allegedly took into the examination room without authorisation.
Her presence in the examination room was connected to the special examination arrangements for a candidate with special needs, whose responses she was assigned to transcribe.
The incident has raised questions about how examination supervision and the handling of candidates requiring special assistance are managed, particularly where examination personnel are entrusted with responsibilities that demand the highest levels of integrity.
It also raises concerns about the possible exposure of candidates to examination malpractice and the safeguards in place to prevent unauthorised assistance during national examinations.
The alleged incident points to a serious vulnerability in the examination process. A transcriber is entrusted with helping a candidate communicate or record answers in accordance with approved examination arrangements. The role does not confer permission to provide answers, introduce unauthorised materials or influence a candidate’s responses.
If examination personnel entrusted with supporting candidates with special needs compromise that responsibility, the consequences could extend beyond an individual examination room.
Access to examination answers creates an unfair advantage over thousands of other candidates who sit the same examinations under regulated conditions. It undermines the principle that PLE results should reflect individual candidates’ knowledge and abilities.
Such incidents threaten the credibility of national examinations. Parents, schools and institutions rely on PLE results when assessing pupils’ academic progress and determining admission to secondary schools. Any suspicion that results were influenced by leaked answers can weaken public confidence in the entire assessment system.
The incident could also undermine efforts to ensure equal opportunities for children with disabilities and other special examination needs. Special arrangements, including the use of transcribers, are intended to remove barriers to assessment, not create opportunities for examination manipulation.
The incident also raises questions about the procedures used by the school to supervise examination personnel and safeguard examination materials.
Schools hosting national examinations are expected to maintain strict controls over examination rooms, including the conduct of invigilators, transcribers and other authorised personnel.
The presence of papers allegedly containing answers inside an examination room raises questions about how the materials were obtained, how they entered the room and whether other individuals knew about their presence.
It remains important, however, to establish whether the incident was isolated or part of a wider attempt to compromise the examination process. The available information does not, on its own, establish that other teachers or school administrators were involved.
Insight Post contacted the school’s headteacher seeking clarification on the circumstances surrounding Mwesigwa’s arrest, the school’s account of the incident and whether there were any other examination irregularities. The school had not responded by the time of publication.
The incident serves as a reminder that examination malpractice is not merely a breach of examination regulations. It threatens the fairness of the education system, disadvantages honest candidates and risks damaging the confidence that families place in national examinations.
As investigations continue, establishing how the unauthorised answers reached the examination room and whether anyone else was involved will be important in protecting the integrity of the 2026 PLE.
ENDS.
































