In Uganda, a quiet but determined fight is happening. The East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) project, which promises to bring economic growth, is causing serious problems for the communities it passes through.
Behind the talk of progress, many people, especially those in the pipeline route in the ten districts of Hoima, Kikuube, Kakumiro, Kyankwanzi, Gomba, Mubende, Lwengo, Sembabule, Kyotera and Rakai, are facing displacement from their homes, damage to their environment, and a loss of their way of life.
The 1,443km EACOP project was meant to boost Uganda’s economy, but for the people living in its path, it has brought more harm than good.
However, several families have been forced to leave their homes, wildlife and natural habitats are being destroyed, and the social fabric of communities is being torn apart.
As these issues continue to escalate, the affected communities are coming together to demand justice and fight for their rights, according to a Monday-26 August 2024 memorandum by the EACOP Project-Affected Communities in the Albertine Region of Uganda, addressed to TotalEnergies, The Chinese Ambassador to Uganda, The Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), and The Speaker of the Parliament of Uganda.
Human Rights Violations
The EACOP project has led to a series of human rights abuses. People who live in the areas where the pipeline is being built have faced threats and harassment to force them into accepting compensation that is far below what they deserve for their land and homes.
This has left many families without enough money to rebuild their lives or find new places to live.
Additionally, those who speak out against the project, such as environmental and human rights defenders, have been arrested and threatened.
These actions have made it difficult for community members to stand up for their rights and demand fair treatment.
Many people have been displaced from their homes without receiving adequate compensation or support to start over.
This displacement has caused economic and social instability, leaving affected communities struggling to survive.
The arrival of workers from the oil companies has also led to an increase in gender-based violence and HIV cases, adding to the hardships these communities face.
Economic Impacts on Local Communities
The EACOP project is also threatening Uganda’s local economies, particularly in agriculture, tourism, and fishing. Many people have lost access to their farmland and fishing areas, leading to food shortages and loss of income.
The compensation provided by the project is often inadequate, leaving families without the means to sustain themselves.
Efforts to help affected communities restore their livelihoods have been largely ineffective. For example, the project has provided seeds and fertilisers that are not suitable for the local environment, which has led to further damage to the land.
The communities are calling for more relevant and sustainable support that takes their specific needs into account.
The project’s focus on extracting resources for profit is deepening the economic inequalities in Uganda.
While a few benefit from the profits, the majority of Ugandans are left to deal with the environmental damage and economic challenges caused by the project.
Environmental Damage
One of the most alarming effects of the EACOP project is the damage it is causing to Uganda’s environment.
The construction and operation of the pipeline are destroying critical ecosystems, including protected areas like the Murchison Falls National Park.
This destruction is threatening wildlife and biodiversity, with long-term consequences for the environment and the people who depend on it.
The project is also contributing to climate change, as it is expected to emit large amounts of carbon dioxide over its 25-year lifespan.
This goes against Uganda’s commitments to protecting the environment and fighting climate change, and it will make life harder for ordinary Ugandans who are already feeling the effects of a changing climate.
Additionally, the oil activities have led to increased conflicts between people and wildlife, particularly in areas like Buliisa and Nwoya districts.
These conflicts have resulted in the loss of lives, destruction of crops, and further strain on the affected communities.
Cultural and Social Impacts
The EACOP project has also disrupted the cultural and social fabric of the affected communities.
Graves and culturally important sites have been destroyed without proper consultation or respect for local traditions, causing deep emotional pain for the people who live there.
The relocation of families to new housing units that do not fit their cultural practices has further disrupted their lives.
Social problems have also increased due to the presence of oil company workers. There have been more cases of early pregnancies and school dropouts, and the social structure of many communities has been weakened.
The loss of livelihoods and forced displacement have left these communities struggling to cope with the changes brought by the project.
Communities’ Demands for Justice
In response to these severe impacts, the affected communities have put forward several urgent demands.
They are calling for an immediate halt to all EACOP activities and for transparent consultations with the affected communities to address their concerns. They want their voices to be heard and their rights respected.
The communities are also demanding the protection of their human rights, including an end to the harassment and intimidation of those who speak out against the project.
They want the arrests and threats against environmental and human rights defenders to stop immediately.
Environmental and economic justice are also key demands. The communities want the protection of national parks and other important environmental areas, as well as sustainable livelihood restoration programs that are developed in consultation with local people.
The affected communities are calling on TotalEnergies, the company leading the project, to pay reparations for the damage already done.
They also want the Chinese government, which is supporting the project, to withdraw its backing and publicly condemn the ongoing violence against land, human rights, and environmental defenders in Uganda.
Finally, the communities are urging the Ugandan government to invest in renewable energy and other forms of development that benefit everyone, not just a few.
They want the government to prioritise access to essential services like education, healthcare, housing, and employment for all Ugandans.
However, the Petroleum Authority of Uganda, TotalEnergies have not responded to the concerns. As a result, the failure to act on these issues has sparked a spiral of protests both on the local and global scene.
END
English 