Kampala, Uganda
As COP29 drew to a close in Baku, Azerbaijan, the outcomes of this year’s climate summit sparked a wave of mixed reactions.
Hailed by some as a milestone for advancing global climate negotiations, others have labeled it a devastating setback for developing nations.
With an agreement to mobilise $300 billion annually by 2035, far short of the $1.3 trillion requested by vulnerable countries, questions loom over whether the summit’s resolutions adequately address the mounting climate crisis.
In this report, the Insight Post Uganda looks into the key takeaways from COP29, examining the implications for climate finance, health systems, and the broader fight for climate justice.
Is this the progress the world desperately needs, or a glaring missed opportunity for those most in need of support?
Climate Finance: An Inadequate Deal
One of the key outcomes of COP29 was the agreement to mobilise $1.3 trillion annually for developing countries by 2035, including $300 billion from various sources.
However, this falls significantly short of the $1.3 trillion annually requested by least developed countries (LDCs), the G77 + China, and other negotiating blocs such as the African Group of Negotiators (AGN) and the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS).
The funding, intended to address mitigation, adaptation, and loss and damage, was criticised for being both inadequate and delayed.
No immediate financial commitments were made, leaving vulnerable nations without the resources they urgently need to combat climate change.
Critics labeled this approach as a betrayal by wealthy nations, accusing them of shirking their responsibilities while imposing unrealistic timelines.
Despite the promise of the Baku-to-Belém Roadmap, aimed at scaling up finance through grants and non-debt-creating mechanisms, the absence of enforceable provisions and the reliance on private sector contributions has raised concerns about the feasibility and equity of the funding model.
The standing goal to triple outflows from climate funds and the biennial progress review are steps in the right direction but remain insufficient to tackle the escalating crisis.
Carbon Markets: Loopholes for Polluters
COP29 finalised rules for international carbon markets under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This included operationalising mechanisms for crediting and trading emissions reductions between countries.
While this development could streamline cooperative mitigation efforts, the reliance on market-based mechanisms has been criticised for enabling rich countries to offset their emissions rather than reducing them.
Critics argue that these loopholes jeopardise the 1.5°C target, disproportionately shifting the burden to developing countries and communities already grappling with the impacts of climate change.
Furthermore, the lack of robust health safeguards in carbon market projects underscores the need for more comprehensive frameworks that integrate health and environmental justice.
Adaptation: Progress but Lacking Urgency
On adaptation, COP29 advanced the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), launching the Baku Adaptation Roadmap and agreeing on a set of indicators for monitoring progress.
These include social determinants of health, gender equality, and the unique vulnerabilities of children to climate impacts.
However, decisions on national adaptation plans (NAPs) were deferred to 2025, delaying critical actions needed to build resilience.
The establishment of annual high-level dialogues on adaptation is a positive step, offering opportunities to integrate health considerations into climate strategies, but these efforts need accelerated implementation.
Health at the Climate Table
For the first time, COP29 explicitly linked health to climate action through initiatives like the COP Presidencies Continuity Coalition for Climate and Health.
This coalition aims to maintain momentum across COPs, supporting health-inclusive agendas and enhancing transparency on climate-health initiatives.
The high-level roundtable on human development highlighted the urgency of building climate-resilient health systems, with organisations like WHO, AMREF, and ACHA-Africa playing pivotal roles.
Yet, the failure to secure a standalone health theme in the negotiations reflects a missed opportunity to fully integrate health into the UNFCCC framework.
Loss and Damage: Insufficient Mechanisms
The Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD), officially launched at COP29, secured pledges totaling $759 million, but this figure is far from adequate to address the catastrophic impacts of climate change.
The lack of consensus on reviewing the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) further underscores the persistent gaps in addressing the needs of those most affected by climate crises.
Opportunities exist to incorporate health data into loss and damage assessments and enhance the role of health experts in developing technical guidance for affected communities. However, progress on these fronts remains limited.
Prioritising Climate-Health Advocacy
As the world turns its attention to COP30 in Belém, Brazil, health advocates are calling for a more robust integration of health into climate negotiations. Key demands include,
v Standalone Health Agenda: Establishing health as a dedicated theme in COP30 negotiations.
v Enhanced Financing Mechanisms: Developing grant-based, non-debt-creating financial models that prioritise health outcomes.
v Decentralised Decision-Making: Strengthening local-level adaptation and mitigation strategies to ensure inclusive and equitable action.
v Cross-Sectoral Collaboration: Integrating health into broader climate goals, such as food security, gender equity, and just transitions.
v ACHA-Africa has urged stakeholders to build on the momentum from COP29 and prioritise the climate-health nexus in upcoming negotiations, starting with the Subsidiary Bodies meeting (SB61) in 2025.
According to Raymond Ruyoka, Director of the Africa Climate and Health Alliance (ACHA-Africa), the summit, which many termed a “Finance COP,” committed to mobilising $300 billion annually for developing countries by 2035, far below the $1.3 trillion per year demanded by blocs like the G77 + China, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs), and the Africa Group of Negotiators (AGN).
He argues that this figure represents a “take-it-or-leave-it” stance by developed countries, leaving vulnerable nations to grapple with worsening climate impacts.
“The agreement falls far short of what is needed to address the escalating health and ecological crises driven by climate change,” Ruyoka said adding that the Global North continues to mobilise vague promises instead of delivering immediate, grant-based climate finance.
To Ruyoka, the summit has left health advocates particularly concerned, with insufficient funding to build climate-resilient health systems.
The burden of climate change on health and ecosystems in the Global South is expected to intensify, indicating the urgent need for health to become a standalone theme in future climate negotiations, starting with COP30 in Brazil.
Analyst’s perspective
“The $300 billion finance target is a mere fraction of what is needed to meet the climate challenge. It’s a slap in the face to developing countries struggling with the devastating impacts of climate change,” said David Akana, the Director of Programs for Mongabay Africa.
“If we don’t scale up efforts for adaptation and loss and damage funding, the burden will fall disproportionately on the most vulnerable regions,” he added.
Critical Juncture
COP29 represents a turning point in the global climate dialogue, revealing both the potential and the shortcomings of international cooperation.
While progress has been made in integrating health into climate strategies, the outcomes highlight a pressing need for greater ambition, equity, and accountability.
As the climate crisis continues to exacerbate health vulnerabilities, the call for a resilient, sustainable, and justice-driven approach to climate-health integration has never been more urgent.
With concerted action, COP30 could begin a new chapter that ensures no community is left behind in the fight against climate change.
END
English 