Unique identifiers are special codes or numbers assigned to people to help distinguish them from one another in various systems.
In schools, these identifiers are meant to keep track of students throughout their education, making it easier for teachers and administrators to manage important information like grades and attendance.
However, the recent roll-out of multiple unique identifiers has created confusion among parents, students, and educators alike, leaving many wondering how to navigate this new challenge.
What used to be a simple process of identifying students has now morphed into a very complicated maze.
In the past, students would receive a single identifier when they registered for exams, making it clear and straightforward.
Now, however, with the introduction of different numbers from various government departments and schools, families find themselves overwhelmed.
With each new identifier, parents are left scratching their heads, unsure of which number is necessary or even valid, prompting urgent calls for a more streamlined and cohesive identification system.
In the past, students received their first unique identifier when they registered with the Uganda National Examinations Board (UNEB) in primary seven, a simple and clear-cut practice.
Alongside this, some schools issued their student ID numbers, but these were often of limited importance, causing little disruption to the education system.
Now, however, the landscape has shifted dramatically. With the government’s push to enhance education data management, learners find themselves juggling several different identification numbers.
This change was intended to create a cohesive system for tracking student performance and administrative needs, but instead, it has led to widespread confusion, leaving many families unsure of which identifier is necessary or valid.
As concerns rise among parents and teachers alike, the question remains; how can a clear and efficient identification system be established in the face of such overwhelming complexity?
However, recent efforts to streamline education data management and enhance learner identification have inadvertently resulted in a situation where a single student may now possess a minimum of three different identifiers.
Parents like Mike Mukasa have voiced their frustrations over this growing complexity.
For the past few years, schools have repeatedly requested similar information from parents during the registration process.
Mukasa highlighted the initial introduction of national identification cards, which teachers indicated would be used for all educational purposes.
However, shortly after their issuance, the Education Management Information System (EMIS) was introduced, prompting schools to collect the same information again.
“So, what’s the real requirement?” Mukasa questioned, reflecting the confusion felt by many.
Teachers’ concerns
Richard Matovu, a teacher in Kampala, noted that various government institutions appear to be collecting data independently, leading to the generation of unique numbers for students.
Matovu stressed the need for a comprehensive solution that simplifies the identification process, allowing for effective tracking of learners without the current chaos.
His concerns were echoed during a recent meeting between private school owners and the Ministry of Education at Nakasero Primary School, where many teachers highlighted the confusion surrounding learner identification.
Currently, students are assigned multiple identification numbers, creating a complex web of identifiers.
They have national identification numbers issued by the National Identification and Registration Authority (NIRA), learner identification numbers provided by the Ministry of Education through the EMIS system, and index numbers from UNEB for those in primary seven.
In secondary schools, it was expected that learner identification numbers would be used to capture continuous assessment data as required by the new lower secondary curriculum.
However, UNEB operates its system, which issues yet another distinct number, further complicating student identification.
The Ministry of Education has pledged to integrate various education systems to eliminate confusion.
However, significant progress has yet to be made. A major challenge lies in the fact that while both the UNEB and EMIS systems were developed by the same consultant, SMS ONE Ltd, they have not been enabled to utilise a single identifier for the same learner.
Vincent Ssozi, Assistant Commissioner for Statistics, Monitoring, and Evaluation, acknowledged that the Ministry initially proposed a single identifier for all learners: their National Identification Number (NIN).
This concept was part of the relaunch and rollout of the EMIS system in 2022. However, this plan has faced challenges due to many learners lacking NINs.
Ssozi pointed out that over 17 million Ugandans do not have a NIN, raising concerns that adopting it as the primary identifier could hinder the EMIS project.
To address this issue, Ssozi explained, the Ministry decided to allow an alternative identifier, the Learner Identification Number, while awaiting the acquisition of National Identification Numbers by all learners and their parents or guardians.
The Ministry plans to make the NIN a mandatory requirement for all learners enrolling in the EMIS system, especially following NIRA’s upcoming mass enrollment initiative.
As confusion continues, the need for a cohesive and streamlined identification system for learners remains urgent, stating the importance of clarity and communication in educational administration.
END
English 