-Corruption At Play and The Impact On Public Funds
By Insight Post Uganda
Kampala Uganda
There is an ongoing inquiry into the unlawful recruitment of officials in the Microfinance Support Centre (MSC). MSC is a government-owned institution with a lofty mandate to empower the marginalized with affordable credit and business development services.
However, behind the facade of public service, a cloud of uncertainty looms, raising suspicions about the institution’s recruitment process.
As the Public Accounts Committee on Commissions, Statutory Authorities, and State Enterprises (COSASE) seeks answers to the burning questions raised by Members of Parliament (MPs), a tale of irregularities and questionable appointments emerged.
This has since set the stage for an enthralling investigation that could reshape the course of this financial institution’s future.
The committee, chaired by Hon. Joel Ssenyonyi, is demanding genuine answers regarding the appointment of top management officials, particularly focusing on the appointment of the Deputy Executive Director, Hellen Petronilla Masika.
During last week’s session on Thursday, the board members of the MSC were notably absent, failing to address the recruitment queries raised during the inquiry.
COSASE’s Deputy Chairperson, Hon. Lucy Akello, expressed disappointment and promptly directed the clerk to the committee to issue a letter compelling the board and Executive Director John Peter Mujuni to appear before the committee.
The primary concern is centred on Masika’s appointment to the position of Deputy Executive Director. The committee questioned the authenticity of her appointment, as it appeared to circumvent standard due processes, including advertising the position and conducting competitive interviews, as mandated by the human resource policy.
According to the Chairperson (Ssenyonyi), MSC did not comply with competitive recruitment processes. He contended that qualified candidates were not provided with the opportunity to undergo a fair evaluation during the hiring process.
Abdallah Kiwanuka, the Mukono County North MP, further has since criticised the appointment, stating that it violated the institution’s own regulations, which require competition for all positions. The legislator further pointed out that the absence of advertising or inviting other candidates to apply was a clear breach of the recruitment policy.
Masika’s Defence
In her defence, Masika explains that she had initially served as the head of the Performance and Quality Assurance Department and later managed the executive director’s office in an acting capacity for eight months.
During this time, the position of Deputy Executive Director did not exist. However, the board subsequently created the position, and she was appointed based on her performance during her acting tenure.
She asserts that her appointment followed a careful assessment of her performance as acting executive director before the board offered her the position of Deputy Executive Director. She emphasised that her appointment was justified based on merit and performance but the MPs queried the procedure.
However, the committee called for the presentation of MSC’s human resource manual, which would be essential in corroborating the legality of Masika’s appointment.
Prolonged Acting Capacity Roles
The committee also raised concerns about the prolonged acting capacity roles of management officials, such as the corporation secretary and human resource manager, who have remained in their positions for five years without being officially appointed.
As the investigation continues, the public awaits the testimony of the MSC board and executive director, as summoned by COSASE. The outcome of this hearing could have far-reaching implications for the institution’s recruitment practices and overall management.
The spotlight is now on the MSC to demonstrate its commitment to fair and transparent recruitment processes in fulfilling its mandate of offering affordable credit and business development services to its target clientele.
Impact on Taxpayers:
The revelations of recruitment irregularities at the MSC carry significant implications for the taxpayers. As a government-owned institution, the MSC is funded by taxpayer money, and any mismanagement or corruption within the organisation can directly affect public funds.
Still, if appointments to top management positions are made through questionable means, it raises concerns about the competence and integrity of the individuals entrusted with managing public resources.
According to the MPs, the taxpayers rely on the MSC to fulfil its mandate of providing affordable credit and business development services to its target clientele.
However, if key personnel are appointed without following transparent and competitive recruitment procedures, there may be a lack of qualified and capable leadership, which could compromise the institution’s ability to effectively serve its intended beneficiaries.
Furthermore, revelations of misconduct or corruption within a public institution can erode public trust in the government’s ability to manage public funds and implement sound governance practices. Taxpayers may become disillusioned and sceptical about the effectiveness of government agencies, leading to decreased confidence in the overall system.
Impact On The Anti-Corruption Campaign
For the anti-corruption campaign, the uncovering of recruitment irregularities at the MSC serves as a critical test of the government’s commitment to rooting out corruption and ensuring transparency and accountability in its institutions. A robust and fair recruitment process is a fundamental aspect of promoting a corruption-free environment.
The response of the authorities to the MSC inquiry will be closely scrutinised by anti-corruption advocates and the public at large. If the authorities take decisive action to rectify the irregularities and hold those responsible accountable, it can send a strong message that corruption and unethical practices will not be tolerated, regardless of the institution’s status or affiliation.
On the other hand, if there is a lack of proper investigation or accountability, it can undermine the anti-corruption campaign’s credibility and create an impression of a double standard, where powerful individuals or institutions are allowed to act with impunity.
END
English 